|
|
|
|
|
IE Executive Education
Programmes Best Worldwide
|
|
|
Instituto de Empresa is the best business school worldwide in executive education open programmes,
according to the 2005 ranking carried out by the Economist Intelligence Unit. The EIU ranking also
positions Instituto de Empresa as the second school in the world for in-company training programmes.
This is the first year that the Economist Intelligence Unit has produced a specific report on executive
education programmes.
The Economist Intelligence Unit ranking follows the recent Financial Times EMBA ranking which
placed Instituto de Empresa as the 1st and only business school in Spain and 4th in the world in
Executive MBA programmes, a result that has further consolidated Instituto de Empresa’s position as
a world-class provider of executive training programmes.
The EIU based its ranking on parameters such as the quality of programmes, the degree of
internationalisation of the courses, the level of the faculty and course participants,
the impact of the programme on participants’ capacity to meet their professional responsibilities,
subsequent follow-up by the school, the range of the school’s programme portfolio, and the flexibility
of each school in designing programmes tailored to meet the specific needs of different companies.
Presentación de la Cátedra José María Cervelló
|
El Instituto de Empresa presentó el pasado 21 de noviembre la Cátedra José María Cervelló,
en homenaje al profesor Cervelló, jurista de reconocido prestigio, que durante 30 años ha formado a
generaciones de abogados en el Instituto de Empresa. Dentro de las líneas de trabajo de la cátedra se
ofrecerán cursos de formación, se concederán becas para jóvenes talentos, se presentarán trabajos
de investigación y se promoverá el debate sobre temas jurídicos.
Abogado del Estado, socio de Ernst & Young y presidente del Consejo Rector Nacional del Instituto de
Empresa, Cervelló es además un apasionado del arte, doctor en Historia del Arte y académico de la Real
Academia de Bellas Artes de San Fernando. A nivel académico, Cervelló fundó los programas jurídicos del
Instituto de Empresa hace 30 años y fue pionero en el desarrollo de la abogacía internacional en España.
“José María Cervelló es un profesor y un jurista excepcional que enseña a pensar sobre el Derecho,
combinando la lógica con una visión práctica, humana e interdisciplinar”, afirmó en el acto de
presentación, Santiago Iñiguez, decano del Instituto de Empresa, para quien, además, “Cervelló ha
contribuido a sensibilizar a generaciones de abogados sobre la importancia de la deontología profesional”.
Los titulares de la Cátedra José María Cervelló serán este año Carlos López Blanco,
Adolfo Menéndez y
Juan José Torres, abogados del Estado y profesores del Instituto de Empresa. Ellos serán los responsables
de guiar las líneas de trabajo de la cátedra. Entre ellas, este año está previsto desarrollar trabajos
de investigación y debate sobre temas jurídicos, se organizarán programas de formación y se publicará un
libro como homenaje a la figura de José María Cervelló.

Becas para jóvenes talentos
Asimismo, a fin de respaldar a jóvenes talentos del mundo de la abogacía sin recursos económicos,
la cátedra convocará becas para licenciados en Derecho y en Ciencias Económicas y Empresariales,
que deseen cursar el Master en Asesoría Jurídica de Empresas, el Master en Asesoría Fiscal de Empresas
o el Master of International Legal Practice del Instituto de Empresa. Este programa de becas, que
financiará la Fundación Instituto de Empresa, está abierto a abogados de todo el mundo y las ayudas
se otorgarán en función de los méritos académicos y personales de los candidatos. Por otro lado,
como reflejo de la inquietud artística de José María Cervelló, la cátedra también promoverá actividades
vinculadas al mundo del arte.
Finalmente, la cátedra otorgará anualmente el Premio José María Cervelló a una personalidad del mundo
jurídico o del mundo del arte, por su trayectoria profesional ejemplar, así como por su contribución a
la sociedad.
|
Ie and Adecco present the report
‘competitiveness and labour relations
in the 21st century: a european comparison’
|
Spain occupies 14th position in Europe in terms of competitiveness, according to the report on
Competitiveness and Labour Relations in the 21st Century: a European Comparison, drawn up by Instituto de
Empresa and sponsored by Adecco.
The report places Sweden and Finland in first and second positions, and highlights the fact that
"citizens in more competitive countries are more satisfied with their environment and level of well-being,"
and that "workers in more competitive environments are more independent, freer to organise their work
and more likely to take part in the workings of the company."
Although the level of training among Spanish workers is similar to the average of other
European countries, Spain has a relatively low position in the ranking. The explanation lies
in the strictness of the administrative environment and in lower spending on R&D, which leads to
lower productivity levels, fewer patents and lower high-technology exports than in the countries that
lead in Europe.
This analysis included other social variables, such as how citizens perceive their levels of happiness,
health and their general faith in public systems and the economy. In more competitive countries, citizens
have a greater appreciation of social spending if their greater perception of personal well-being is
anything to go by. With the exception of two countries (Ireland, where the perception of real social
spending is very positive, and France, where exactly the opposite occurs), it would seem that the
competitiveness of the country has a very positive impact on the perception of social spending.
In turn, the same proportions of public investments are not so well received by citizens when countries
are lower in the competitiveness ranking. Furthermore, personal health and happiness indicators are
greater when levels of competitiveness are higher.
Although no evidence has been found of what we could call "social roots" for competitiveness, the
study points out that the countries that value success and personal wealth more highly are those which
occupy the lowest positions in the competitiveness ranking. The authors of the report feel that this
contradicts the cliché that the desire for personal wealth is a powerful source of motivation for work.
Another of the ideas put forward in the report is that the countries in higher positions on the ranking
give priority to independence and initiative instead of more conservative values, while less competitive
countries conform more readily (in that "it is more important to behave correctly" and "follow the norm").
It is also interesting to note the greater importance of hedonistic values (the importance of "having a
good time" and "having a fun") than those related to personal success and social influence in more
competitive countries.

Human resource policies
The report also highlights the fact that HR policies should
ensure that employees are more involved in organising their work. The report points to the fact
that the challenge facing competitiveness in the 21st century requires a new model of labour relations
in which highly qualified workers have greater flexibility and capacity for influencing decisions.
The authors speak of a "new employment contract" based on the trust of the professional in the public
and social system, on a lower level of conformism and more participation in corporate decisions.
Furthermore, the perception of flexibility is related to the productivity and not to a longer working
day. The study shows that the transition from "working more" to "working better" needs to be given a
more important role in current debates on productivity in both public sector and private business management.
Spanish society shows itself to be one of the most conformist in Europe. The authors insist that to open
up a road for competitiveness in Spain, the country needs more flexible markets, more education, and an
open model of labour relations where workers have a greater capacity to influence their environment.
|
|
|
|